Are You Eating FDA-Approved Arsenic?
You gotta love the government’s strategy to help us “eat healthy.”
City after city in the U.S. has banned trans fats like they’re trying to protect us. Of course, they neglect to tell us that trans fats are being replaced mostly by a type of fat that could be even worse.
But I’ve already blogged about that in Ban Trans Fats, Increase Diabetes?
Clogging your arteries is so yesterday.
No, today I’d like to talk about the dunderheads who decided it was healthy to put arsenic in our food.
Anyone who reads my blog probably knows I don’t believe in going to extremes to lose weight or eat healthy. I don’t cut the fat off pork chops or the skin off chicken.
Life’s too short.
If they keep putting arsenic in our food, it may get even shorter.
You’re safe if you live in the European Union. They don’t allow this foolish practice.
But here in the U.S., chicken producers use over 2 million pounds a year of roxarsone — an FDA-approved feed additive made from arsenic — to fight parasites, improve meat color, and produce bigger-breasted birds.
To me, common sense suggests that if you feed a potential POISON to chickens, there will be some negative health consequences down the road.
But why bother with common sense when we can spend millions of dollars studying the obvious: should we feed a potential poison to the chickens we eat?
About 95% of the arsenic passes through the birds. It can end up as fertilizer and possibly contaminate drinking water.
The rest of the arsenic settles into the chickens, including their meat.
The FDA believes the level of arsenic in the birds is safe. But the U.S. Department of Agriculture only tests chicken livers. They don’t test for arsenic in breast and thigh meat, which is what most of us eat.
They also don’t address the issue of cumulative human exposure. Chronic arsenic exposure may cause cancer, heart disease, and brain damage.
Tyson Foods and a few other chicken producers have stopped using arsenic in their feed. But most chickens in the U.S. still eat arsenic.
Yes, it’s nice to know the government is watching out for our health. We can chow down on arsenic in our chickens and mercury in our fish.
But hey, at least we’re protected from trans fats.
Technorati Tags: arsenic, chicken, nutrition, roxarson, FDA, trans fat










April 12th, 2007 at 12:53 pm
Beautiful. That’ll make us healthy.
April 12th, 2007 at 1:09 pm
Who else besides Tyson doesn’t use arsenic? Is there a way to find out?
April 12th, 2007 at 1:14 pm
If the arsenic in the feed makes the chickens fatter, will eating chickens with arsenic make us fatter?
April 12th, 2007 at 2:09 pm
Gotta wonder if this has anything to do with cancer rates in certain parts of the country where they breed chickens.
April 12th, 2007 at 3:07 pm
If Tyson and the European chicken producers can raise chickens without arsenic, why can’t everybody else? Why are they exposing us to arsenic?
April 12th, 2007 at 5:18 pm
Wow! Is anything safe to eat?
April 12th, 2007 at 7:24 pm
Tammi,
There’s an organization called the Institute for Agriculture & Trade Policy (IATP) which tested actual chicken samples from supermarkets to see which ones contained arsenic. I believe the results are from 2006. But that might give you a start to find producers who minimize or eliminate arsenic in their chicken feed. I believe IATP actually names the brands they tested.
You can access the information at iatp.org/foodandhealth. Read the report called “Playing Chicken” and a Q & A on the subject to get more information.
Mary, I have no idea but that’s a good question.
Mags, I agree. There doesn’t seem to be a good reason to do this. It sounds like a profit motive to me.
Stephanie, I used to think so. I’m not so sure anymore.
April 15th, 2007 at 10:22 pm
You’re still eating chicken??
April 16th, 2007 at 1:25 am
Dr. J,
I actually had chicken for dinner tonight. Old habits die hard and I probably will, too.